- Fundraising Fieldnotes
- Posts
- When is a SAFE Unsafe? + Fundraising Fieldnotes 5.3.22
When is a SAFE Unsafe? + Fundraising Fieldnotes 5.3.22
A deep dive into the trouble with post-money cap SAFEs
Hey - it’s Jason Yeh 🕺🏻
Up till now, I've sent Fundraising Fieldnotes on Fridays. Today is not Friday. Today is the day we test whether or not you all would rather open this email on Tuesdays!
So enjoy reading this Tuesday recap of thoughts I’ve had while helping founders solve their fundraising challenges this past week (5.3.22)
If you have any questions, please reply! I try to get to every comment/question I get :)
Reminder to check out the gifts for referring 1, 3, and 5 subscribers and grab your referral link at the end of this issue!
On to the Fieldnotes for 5.3.22…
When is a SAFE Unsafe?
2 weeks ago I posted a Twitter thread that went viral. Here was the lead into that thread:
I see hundreds of deals every year
In the past 2 yrs, 99% of the deals I've seen <$2MM have been done on POST-money cap SAFEs
But 99% of founders don’t know how these work (& they pay for this ignorance)
Read on for more + the excel model that clarifies things 👇
— Jason Yeh (@jayyeh)
1:37 PM • Apr 7, 2022
You might think the thread is just a list of complaints. It's not.
To make sure people understood my point, I started with background/history and explained basic mechanics of a SAFE.
It spread because I explained a topic most founders don’t understand but are too ashamed to ask about. It doesn’t hurt that I exposed something insidious about SAFEs…
I converted the thread to more of an essay format. Enjoy!
The Danger of Post-Money SAFEs
I see hundreds of deals every year.
In the past 2 yrs, 99% of those deals under $3MM have been done on POST-money cap SAFEs. The crazy thing is 99% of founders don’t know how this fairly new fundraising instrument works.
The worst part is that this ignorance comes with a major cost…
First a bit of history
In the beginning, people made their investments into startups via the direct purchase of equity. Companies would collect money and issue equity. This is an involved process that requires extensive legal work. And any time the words “extensive” and “legal” come together you know you’re talking about large amounts of time and money.
This made raising capital at the earliest stages of companies more complicated than necessary.
To address that, the convertible note was introduced. With this new format, companies could quickly raise money using a 2-3 page legal document.
Convertible notes were a debt agreement that would convert into equity when the company raised an equity round in the future.
The speed and relative simplicity of convertible notes were great, but they had annoying parts too. They were inconsistent between law firms and included elements of debt that didn't apply to startups.
Startups didn’t have any other options when it came to faster ways to raise capital so they lived with the pain. The downsides were just a cost of doing business.
...until the SAFE arrived
SAFE stands for Simple Agreement for Future Equity
YC introduced the first SAFE in 2014 to great fanfare. Why? SAFEs represented a standardized, founder-friendly replacement to the convertible note (the old way startups raised money quickly).
SAFEs eliminated a lot of annoying features in convertible notes like interest and maturation dates. More importantly, YC pushed it to all 100+ graduating companies. When the most sought after startup investments all use the same documentation, it effectively creates a standard. This standard did a lot for the broader startup community by eliminating lots of legal money and time wasted. It was a godsend to founders.
The first SAFE used PRE-money caps.
But what are “caps”?
The cap is a number that determines the valuation used to calculate ownership for SAFE holders when it converts (in most cases).
The exception is when a company raises an equity round at a valuation that is lower than the cap. The details of that can be saved for another post because it happens so infrequently.
Here is a spelled out example:
Smart Twitter Takes
Passes might hurt but always respond gracefully. You never know when you might see them again (could be in a few years…or a few days later!)
A VC I was excited about passed on Valentine’s Day (last Monday).
I thanked them for their time, and responded to their reasons for passing.
On Saturday, they emailed me back saying they had changed their mind and wanted to put in a big check!
Send that email, you never know!
— Samuel Spitz (@samuel_spitz)
4:07 PM • Feb 22, 2022
From the beginning, show investors you’re building your company the right way… SHIP!
This is how startups are built.
— Andrew Gazdecki (@agazdecki)
1:10 AM • Mar 1, 2022
Till next week. Stay adamant and be chased.
Jason
P.S. DECEPTION - I have not! (i should not find this as funny as i do)
In case you missed it…
Last week, we shared tips for finding a technical co-founder / CTO :
Small asks!
If you thought this was helpful or enjoyable in any way, I’d love for you to:
Share this newsletter with others who would enjoy it using your referral link above
Follow me on Twitter where I’ve begun building in public (my course, my podcast, etc)!
Ask me your fundraising questions so I can help you and cover them in a future issue
Listen with a friend to Funded, my podcast that tells the rollercoaster stories of how founders raised millions (and subscribe🙏)
Feedback Time!
|